Table 3 Percentage of genetic variance explained for each trait by each RHM method, and previous GWAS analyses (James et al. 2022).

From: Evaluating regional heritability mapping methods for identifying QTLs in a wild population of Soay sheep

Trait

Percentage of genetic variance explained by SNP-RHM

Percentage of genetic variance explained by Hap-RHM

Percentage of genetic variance explained by SNHap-RHM

Percentage of genetic variance explained by GWAS

Lamb foreleg length

0.00%

6.84%

0.00%

1.17%

Lamb hindleg length

0.00%

10.19%

0.00%

1.48%

Lamb metacarpal length

56.59%

13.64%

77.16%

5.14%

Lamb jaw length

0.00%

10.05%

1.79%

0.00%

Adult August weight

0.00%

46.10%

63.33%

9.31%

Adult foreleg length

0.00%

4.13%

5.29%

9.49%

Adult hindleg length

0.17%

2.68%

2.71%

5.24%

Adult metacarpal length

27.09%

5.24%

27.58%

8.03%

Adult jaw length

0.00%

7.84%

9.24%

2.39%

  1. Birth weight and lamb August weight have not been included, as no genetic variance has been explained by any of these methods.