Table 3 Maximum accuracies obtained among four training set optimization methods in predictions made for each combination of trait and family

From: Genomic prediction of fruit texture and training population optimization towards the application of genomic selection in apple

Family

Trait

Accuracy

TS size

Method

FjDe

ALD

0.23

77

Mean relationship

FNP

0.18

21

Max relationship

PC1

0.26

77

Mean relationship

PC2

0.36

56

Max relationship

FjPi

ALD

0.36

189

Mean relationship

FNP

0.59

174

Max relationship

PC1

0.36

178

Max relationship

PC2

0.26

202

Mean relationship

FjPL

ALD

0.10

130

CDmean-opt

FNP

0.16

22

Max relationship

PC1

0.20

120

Max relationship

PC2

0.22

10

CDmean-opt

GaPi

ALD

0.46

156

Mean relationship

FNP

0.40

13

Max relationship

PC1

0.54

191

Clusters

PC2

0.28

19

Mean relationship

GaPL

ALD

0.72

136

Clusters

FNP

0.78

37

Max relationship

PC1

0.81

129

Mean relationship

PC2

0.40

140

Max relationship

GDFj

ALD

0.21

66

Mean relationship

FNP

0.32

15

Max relationship

PC1

0.19

31

Mean relationship

PC2

0.01

10

Mean relationship

  1. TS training set, ALD acoustic linear distance, ANP number of acoustic peaks, FNP number of force peaks, PC1 principal component 1 (synthetic trait), PC2 principal component 2 (synthetic trait)