Table 2 Fruit quality traits analyzed in this study.
Trait | Abbreviation | Description [assessment type] | Evaluation year | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parental pop. | Breeding pop. | |||||
‘Orin’ × ‘Akane’ | ‘Shinano Gold’ × Morioka 64 ‘Sinsekai’ × ‘Morinokagayaki’ ‘Kotaro’ × ‘Kinshu’ | Others | ||||
Harvest time | PickDay | Number of days to harvest from January 1 | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1–4 |
Over color | OvColor | Fruit skin redness. Rank: 1 (green/yellow/orange), 2 (pale red), 3 (red/brown), 4 (bright red/purple), 5 (deep red) [visual] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Degree of skin coloration | PerOC | Proportion of fruit skin area coloring red. Rank: 1 (<20%), 2 (20≤–<40%), 3 (40%≤–<60%), 4 (60%≤–<80%), 5 (80%≤) [visual] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Russet top | RusTop | Fruit skin area covered with russet, examined from the top side. Rank: 1 (nil), 2 (little), 3 (mild), 4 (large), 5 (whole) [visual] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Russet body | RusBody | Fruit skin area covered with russet, examined from the horizontal side. Rank: 1 (nil), 2 (little), 3 (mild), 4 (large), 5 (whole) [visual] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Russet calyx | RusCal | Fruit skin area covered with russet, examined from the calyx side. Rank: 1 (nil), 2 (little), 3 (mild), 4 (large), 5 (whole) [visual] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Scarf skin | Scarf | Presence of scarf skin on fruit. 0 (absence), 1 (presence) [visual] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Cracking top | CraTop | Presence of fruit cracking, examined from the top side. 0 (nil), 1 (observed) [visual] | — | 2 | 1–3 | 1 |
Cracking body | CraBody | Presence of fruit cracking, examined from the horizontal side. 0 (nil), 1 (observed) [visual] | — | 2 | 1–3 | 1 |
Cracking calyx | CraCal | Presence of fruit cracking, examined from the calyx side. 0 (nil), 1 (observed) [visual] | — | 2 | 1–3 | 1 |
Preharvest fruit drop | Drop | Degree of fruit drop before the harvest time. Rank: 1 (nil), 2 (slight), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe) [visual] | 2 | 2 | 1–3 | 1 |
Internal mold | IntMold | Presence of mold in fruit core. 0 (nil), 1 (observed) [visual] | — | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Juiciness | Juice | Juiciness during chewing after peeling. Rank: 1 (dry), 2 (slightly dry), 3 (intermediate), 4 (slightly juicy), 5 (juicy) [sensory] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Degree of watercore | WatCore | Degree of watercore observed in equatorial plane of fruit. Rank: 1(nil), 2(slight), 3(moderate), 4(severe) [visual] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Sweetness | Sweet | Sweetness of peeled fruit. Rank: −2 (weak), −1 (rather weak), 0 (moderate), 1 (rather strong), 2 (strong) [sensory] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Acidity | Acidity | Acidity of peeled fruit. Rank: −2 (weak), −1 (rather weak), 0 (moderate), 1 (rather strong), 2 (strong) [sensory] | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Astringency | Ast | Astringency of peeled fruit. 0 (absence), 1 (presence) [sensory] | — | — | 1–3 | 1 |
Weight | Weight | Fruit weight (g) | 1–25 | 3 | 1–3 | 1 |
Soluble solid content | Brix | Brix of the squeezed juice, measured by a refractometer | 1–25 | 2 | — | 1 |
Malic acid | MalAcid | Acidity of squeezed juice (%), measured as titratable acid content converted into malic acid weight | 1–25 | 2 | — | 1–2 |
Firmness | Firm | Mean firmness of sunny and shaded sides of the fruit (Magness-Taylor penetrometer) (lb) | 1–25 | 2 | — | 1–2 |
Degree of mealiness | DegMeal | Flesh mealiness after storage for 28–30 days under 20 °C, measured following to Moriya et al.75 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 |
Max of mealiness | MaxMeal | Flesh mealiness after storage for 40 days under 20 °C | — | — | — | 1 |
Sucrose | Suc | Sucrose content of the juice (mg/mL), obtained using a high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) | 2 | 1 | — | — |
Glucose | Glu | Glucose content of the juice (mg/mL), obtained using an HPLC | 2 | 1 | — | — |
Fructose | Fru | Fructose content of the juice (mg/mL), obtained using an HPLC | 2 | 1 | — | — |
Sorbitol | Sor | Sorbitol content of the juice (mg/mL), obtained using an HPLC | 2 | 1 | — | — |