Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Setting the mood: improving patient satisfaction and clinic efficiency during penile duplex doppler ultrasound assessment

Abstract

We sought to identify specific testing conditions that may negatively impact patient experience with Penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (PDDU). We developed a survey designed to assess perception with several predetermined clinical-environment factors. Patients completed the voluntary written-survey at the time of PDDU between January 2022 and June 2024. 37.4% of patients reported at least one of the following negatively impacted their experience: bright lights, hallway noises, room temperature, and frequent staff assessments. Preference regarding clinician gender and type (physician versus advanced practice provider) was also assessed. When assessed prior to starting the consultation, we found that 57.6% reported no provider preference, while 40.6% preferred consultation with physicians. 72.6% reported no provider gender preference, while 25.2% preferred males. In contrast, when assessed at the completion of the consultation, 84.4 and 85.7% reported no preference regarding provider type or gender, respectively. Based on interim analysis of survey response data, a call-button was implemented for patients to alert staff when adequate erection rigidity was achieved during testing. The mean time to response decreased significantly from 15.6 min ±4.2 to 11.2 min ±4.2 (p < 0.001). Further work is needed to validate and identify additional modifiable factors that can be improved upon to enhance patient experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Provider type (Physician versus advanced practice provider) preferences based on patient response.
Fig. 2: Provider gender preferences based on patient response.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Lue TF, Hricak H, Marich KW, Tanagho EA. Vasculogenic impotence evaluated by high-resolution ultrasonography and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Radiology. 1985;155:777–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ziegelmann MJ, Bajic P, Levine LA. Peyronie’s disease: contemporary evaluation and management. Int J Urol. 2020;27:504–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kho YY, Lee SHE, Chin K, Sidek NZ, Ma VC, Seng DH, et al. US of the penis: beyond erectile dysfunction. Radiographics. 2024;44:e230157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ, Brock G, Morales AM. Standardization of vascular assessment of erectile dysfunction: standard operating procedures for duplex ultrasound. J Sex Med. 2013;10:120–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuo YC, Liu SP, Chen JH, Chang HC, Tsai VF, Hsieh JT. Feasability of a novel audio-video sexual stimulation system: an adjunct to the use of penile duplex Doppler ultrasonography for the investigation of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3979–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Bocciardi A, Barbieri L, Rigatti P, Pizzini G, et al. Improved minimally-invasive assessment of penile haemodynamics: the combination of colour Doppler sonography and injection-stimulation test. Int J Impot Res. 1995;7:33–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carneiro F, Nascimento B, Miranda EP, Cury J, Cerri GG, Chammas MC. Audiovisual sexual stimulation improves diagnostic accuracy of penile doppler ultrasound in patients with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2020;17:249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cannarella R, Calogero AE, Aversa A, Condorelli RA, La Vignera S. Differences in penile hemodynamic profiles in patients with erectile dysfunction and anxiety. J Clin Med. 2021;10:402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravikanth R. Diagnostic categorization of erectile dysfunction using duplex color doppler ultrasonography and significance of phentolamine redosing in abolishing false diagnosis of venous leak impotence: a single center experience. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2020;30:344–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Laughlin DJ, Strelow B, Fellows N, Kelsey E, Peters S, Stevens J, et al. Addressing anxiety and fear during the female pelvic examination. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12:2150132721992195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ET, KN, SC, SH, TK, MZ all helped with study design, data analysis, and manuscript writing/ revising.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Ziegelmann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was deemed exempt by the institional review board at Mayo Clinic. The voluntary survey was anonymous and we did not gather any protected healthcare information.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tentis, E.R., Nelson, K.E., Carlson, S.M. et al. Setting the mood: improving patient satisfaction and clinic efficiency during penile duplex doppler ultrasound assessment. Int J Impot Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01099-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01099-2

Search

Quick links