Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Randomized controlled trial of a video-based educational platform prior to in-person vasectomy consult

Abstract

We performed a randomized-control trial to assess the impact of a video-based educational platform (VEP) on the pre-consult knowledge and post-consult satisfaction of patients presenting for vasectomy consultation. Between December 2022–2023, 39 patients were randomized on an alternating basis to receive either access to a VEP before their vasectomy consult (n = 18) or an in-person consult only (n = 21)(standard of care [SOC]). The VEP was created in partnership with EngagedMD, and consisted of 6 videos (total of 7 min) with mandatory checkpoint questions. A 10-question assessment was given prior to the start of the vasectomy consultation, and custom Likert-scale surveys were given after the consultation. Age, level of education, and marital status were not statistically different between the groups. The VEP group scored higher on the baseline knowledge assessment compared to the SOC group (90% vs 60%, p = <0.001). 100% of patients agreed the VEP helped educate them on the risks and benefits of vasectomy. 94.1% of patients endorsed that the VEP enhanced their ability to converse with the medical team. Compared to the SOC group, the VEP group had higher median composite survey scores regarding comfort with procedure decision-making, clinical expectations, and overall care satisfaction (34 vs 31, p = 0.004).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Schulz AE, Dave P, Clearwater W, Liu J, Kase J, Watts K, et al. Assessment of patient understanding prior to urological procedures. Urology. 2023;172:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, Sudore RL, Schillinger D, Klein-Fedyshin M, et al. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: an updated systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2020;40:119–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Winter M, Kam J, Nalavenkata S, Hardy E, Handmer M, Ainsworth H, et al. The use of portable video media vs standard verbal communication in the urological consent process: a multicentre, randomised controlled, crossover trial. BJU Int. 2016;118:823–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore AL, Howlett JB, Phull MK, Mpungose LL, Samson SR. Does the use of video improve patient satisfaction in the consent process for local-anaesthetic urological procedures? Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53:1051–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bollschweiler E, Apitzsch J, Obliers R, Koerfer A, Mönig SP, Metzger R, et al. Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2008;248:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eggers C, Obliers R, Koerfer A, Thomas W, Koehle K, Hoelscher AH, et al. A multimedia tool for the informed consent of patients prior to gastric banding. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:2866–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ihedioha U, Sangal S, Mastermann J, Singh B, Chaudhri S. Preparation for elective colorectal surgery using a video: a questionnaire-based observational study. JRSM Short Rep. 2012;3:58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenberg ML, Lipshultz LI. Estimating the number of vasectomies performed annually in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. J Urol. 2010;184:2068–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharlip ID, Belker AM, Honig S, Labrecque M, Marmar JL, Ross LS, et al. Vasectomy: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2012;188:2482–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Charles DK, Anderson DJ, Newton SA, Dietrich PN, Sandlow JI. Vasectomy regret among childless men. Urology. 2023;172:111–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spielberger CD, Lushene RE, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI (Form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.

  12. Bernard AL, Barbour AK, Meernik C, Madeira JL, Lindheim SR, Goodman LR. The impact of an interactive multimedia educational platform on patient comprehension and anxiety during fertility treatment: a randomized controlled trial. F S Rep. 2022;3:214–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Madeira JL, Rehbein J, Christianson MS, Lee M, Parry JP, Pennings G, et al. Using the EngagedMD multimedia platform to improve informed consent for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:1338–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Madeira JL, Andraka-Christou B. Paper trails, trailing behind: improving informed consent to IVF through multimedia applications. J Law Biosci. 2016;3:2–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradshaw A, Ballon-Landa E, Owusu R, Hsieh T-C. Poor compliance with postvasectomy semen testing: analysis of factors and barriers. Urology. 2020;136:146–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jeff Isner and the EngagedMD team for their partnership in development of the vasectomy education platform.

Funding

No funding was received for this study. Then education platform was developed with EngagedMD, but there was no monetary transaction or honoraria for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SH, JD, JAH, and REB designed the study and helped write the manuscript. SK performed statistical analysis and helped with experimental design, and data interpretation. LN, NEB, and CA contributed with recruitment, data collection, patient counseling, and interpretation of results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Solomon Hayon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

After the conclusion of the study, we would like to disclose that Dr. Halpern has become a consultant of Engaged MD (Washington DC, USA).

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Northwestern Institutional Review Board (study number: STU00217389). Patients provided informed consent for study participation. All study methods were in compliance with the IRB guidelines and regulations for human subject research. The IRB determined this was not a clinical trial, and thus it was not registered with clinicaltrials.gov.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayon, S., Kumar, S.S., Dubin, J.M. et al. Randomized controlled trial of a video-based educational platform prior to in-person vasectomy consult. Int J Impot Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01234-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01234-7

Search

Quick links