Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01550-z, Article published online 12 December 2017
The originally published version of this Article was updated shortly after publication to add the word ‘Ticks’ to the title, following its inadvertent removal during the production process. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01550-z.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Peñalver, E., Arillo, A., Delclòs, X. et al. Publisher Correction: Ticks parasitised feathered dinosaurs as revealed by Cretaceous amber assemblages. Nat Commun 9, 472 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02913-w
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02913-w
This article is cited by
-
Interaction between spiders and ticks—ancient arthropod predatory behavior?
Parasitology Research (2024)
-
Large-scale countrywide screening for tick-borne pathogens in field-collected ticks in Latvia during 2017–2019
Parasites & Vectors (2020)
