Table 2 Model details for the site average shift rate

From: Land-use change interacts with climate to determine elevational species redistribution

Parameter

Estimate

Std. error

t value

Pr (>|t|)

Model 1

 Intercept

11.24

2.46

4.58

<0.001

scale (Loss)

−5.80

2.93

−1.98

0.06

scale (Cover)

6.85

2.69

2.54

0.02

scale (T)

12.94

3.24

3.99

<0.001

scale (Loss) × scale (T)

15.98

4.52

3.53

0.001

scale (Loss) × scale (Cover)

5.84

3.61

1.62

0.11

Model 2*

 Intercept

11.09

2.51

4.43

<0.001

scale (Loss)

−7.78

2.71

−2.87

0.007

scale (Cover)

5.87

2.68

2.19

0.03

scale (T)

11.61

3.20

3.63

<0.001

scale (Loss) × scale (T)

15.79

4.62

3.42

0.002

Model 3

 Intercept

8.68

2.97

2.92

0.006

scale (Loss)

−3.36

3.25

−1.04

0.31

scale (Cover)

6.99

2.64

2.65

0.01

scale (T)

13.60

3.21

4.24

<0.001

 Type_plant

2.88

4.62

0.62

0.54

scale (Loss) × scale (T)

18.16

4.76

3.82

<0.001

scale (Loss) × Type_plant

−9.75

4.44

−2.20

0.03

  1. Details of the three best fitting models (Table 1) for the site average shift rate (n = 43). Predictor variables are scaled (cf. the scale() function in R) for comparison purposes
  2. *See Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 for unscaled estimates and weighted coefficients of model 2, the most parsimonious model
  3. T: baseline temperature, Loss: forest loss percentage, Cover: forest cover percentage, Type: taxa type (animal or plant)