Table 3 Detailed statistics corresponding with Fig. 3
Comparison | Statistical test | n | Statistic | p-value | Outliers? | Figure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | ||||||
Ex vivo microglial bead phagocytosis | One-way ANOVA | Four animals; two replications/condition; 2–3 z-stacks/replication | F(2,67) = 6.24 | 0.003 | N/A | Fig. 3a |
Vehicle:NIF 60 ng | Holm-Sidak’s post-hoc | 23:24 | t(67) = 2.49 | 0.030 | ||
Vehicle:NIF 120 ng | Holm-Sidak’s post-hoc | 23:23 | t(67) = 0.91 | 0.370 | ||
NIF 60 ng:NIF 120 ng | Holm-Sidak’s post-hoc | 24:23 | t(67) = 3.41 | 0.003 | ||
B | ||||||
Ex vivo NIF timecourse: NIF immunoreactivity | One-way ANOVA | Three animals; two replications/condition; three z-stacks/replication | F(2,15) = 0.63 | 0.295 | N/A | Fig. 3c |
C | ||||||
Ex vivo NIF timecourse: CD11b immunoreactivity | One-way ANOVA | Three animals; two replications/condition; three z-stacks/replication | F(2,15) = 0.21 | 0.265 | N/A | Fig. 3d |
D | ||||||
In vivo matched NIF-Vehicle injection: male | One sample t-test (from 100) | Four animals; 4–7 sections/animal | t(3) = 9.24 | 0.003 | N/A | Fig. 3F |
E | ||||||
In vivo matched NIF-Vehicle injection: female | One sample t-test (from 100) | Four animals; 5–6 sections/animal | t(3) = 0.07 | 0.947 | N/A | Fig. 3H |
