Table 1 Performance of ML models compared to other popular water models
ML-BOP | ML-BOP /dih | ML-mW | mW | TIP4P /2005 | MB-pol | iAMOEBA | SPC/E | TIP3P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neighbors3.3 Å, 298 K | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 |
resRDF, 298 K | 3 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 0 |
resADF, 298 K | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
ln D298 K | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 0 |
ρ298K, 1atma | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 7 |
ρmaxa | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 2 |
TMDa | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 0 |
ΔHvap | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 10 |
Tm | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
TMD - Tm | 10 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
ΔHmelta | 7 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 6 | – | 7 | 0 | 0 |
ΔSmelt | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | – | 7 | 3 | 0 |
ρliq at Tma | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 6 |
ρIh at Tma | 7 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3 |
ΔVmelt | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
(dp/dT)melt | 9 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 10 | – | 9 | 8 | 0 |
Average score | 8.1 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 6.1 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 5.6 | 3.4 |