Table 3 Social and institutional conditions
From: Social-ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs
Attributes | Measurement | Site | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
Dependence on resource | Percentage of respondents who ranked fishing as their primary livelihood—FS | 92% | 85% | 92% | 70% | 99% |
Rights to devise institution | Yes/no—ref. 53 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ability to exclude outsiders | Yes/no—CL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Organizational experience/leadership | Yes/no—ref. 53 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rules adapted to local condition | Yes/no—CL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Participation in decision making | Respondent was not (0), passively (1), or actively (2) involved in decisions about resource management, or held a leadership position (3); mean/SD—FS | 0.76 (0.73) | 0.98 (0.80) | 0.62 (0.72) | 0.68 (0.72) | 0.74 (0.67) |
Monitors locally accountable | Yes/no—ref. 53 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Graduated sanctions | Yes/no—CL | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |