Table 1 Standardized betas for regressions using political ideology, education, age, and gender

From: Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle

Study

Outcome measure

Political ideology

Education

Age

Gender

1a

Romantic love

0.01

0.05*

−0.02

−0.10**

1a

Love of family

0.10**

0.05**

−0.07**

−0.14**

1a

Love of friends

−0.05**

−0.01

−0.015

−0.17**

1a

Love of all others

−0.17**

0.01

0.175**

−0.19**

1b

Nationalism

0.45**

−0.06**

0.19**

−0.035**

1b

Universalism

−0.42**

−0.06**

0.18**

−0.13**

1c

Identification with community

0.08**

0.06**

0.085**

−0.13**

1c

Identification with country

0.285**

0.01

0.15**

−0.10**

1c

Identification with all humanity

−0.33**

−0.03**

0.04**

−0.155**

2a

Preference for looseness versus tightness

−0.20**

0.01

−0.02

0.003

2a

Preference for color diversity

−0.03+

−0.04*

0.23**

−0.05**

2b

Preference for looseness versus tightness

−0.12**

0.02

−0.06*

0.03

2b

Preference for circle versus triangle

−0.07**

−0.04

−0.01

−0.05+

3a

Personal moral allocation to humans

0.34**

−0.01

−0.09

0.12

3a

Ideal moral allocation to humans

0.28**

−0.01

−0.04

0.18*

3a

Weighted personal moral circle

−0.35**

−0.03

0.07

−0.11

3a

Weighted ideal moral circle

−0.26**

−0.02

0.01

−0.15+

3b

Proportion moral allocation to humans

0.13*

0.15*

0.08

0.13*

3b

Total moral allocation

0.055

0.03

−0.01

−0.09

3b

Moral allocation to humans

0.056

0.03

−0.01

−0.09

3b

Moral allocation to nonhumans

0.055

0.03

−0.01

−0.09

  1. Notes: +p < 0.09; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Effect of gender for moral allocation to humans (Study 3b) becomes marginally significant (p = 0.062) when including the one participant whose total allocation falls outside of 3SD of the mean