Table 1 Result of the GLMM for area of lost suitable habitat

From: Biodiversity can benefit from climate stabilization despite adverse side effects of land-based mitigation

Parameter

Estimate

95% CI

z

p

(Intercept)

−1.757

−1.816 to –1.699

−58.977

<0.001

Scenario (MIT)a

−0.103

−0.107 to –0.098

−43.798

<0.001

Year (2070s)b

0.366

0.362 to 0.371

157.261

<0.001

SSP (SSP1)c

−0.046

−0.051 to –0.040

−17.493

<0.001

SSP (SSP3)c

0.043

0.038 to 0.048

16.508

<0.001

SSP (SSP4)c

−0.037

−0.042 to –0.032

−14.364

<0.001

SSP (SSP5)c

0.107

0.102 to 0.112

40.967

<0.001

Taxonomic group (Amphibians)d

−0.331

−0.450 to –0.213

−5.478

<0.001

Taxonomic group (Reptiles)d

−0.636

−0.769 to –0.503

−9.393

<0.001

Taxonomic group (Birds)d

−0.320

−0.387 to –0.253

−9.344

<0.001

Taxonomic group (Mammals)d

−0.332

−0.422 to –0.241

−7.199

<0.001

GCM (HadGEM2-ES)e

−0.060

−0.065 to –0.054

−22.675

<0.001

GCM (GFDL-CM3)e

0.160

0.155 to 0.166

60.622

<0.001

GCM (MIROC-ESM-CHEM)e

0.138

0.133 to 0.144

52.304

<0.001

GCM (NorESM1-M)e

−0.242

−0.248 to –0.237

−92.188

<0.001

Scenario (MIT)a × Year (2070s)b

−0.128

−0.134 to –0.121

−38.760

<0.001

  1. Parameter estimates with their associated 95% confidence interval and test statistics (Wald’s z-score and p values for Wald test) of the GLMM for area of lost suitable habitat. The shape parameter of the Gamma distribution was estimated as 1.756. Standard deviation of random effects was estimated as 1.186. aBaseline (BL) scenario was set as the reference. bThe years of the 2050s were set as the reference. cSSP2 was set as the reference. dVascular plants was set as the reference. eIPSL-CM5A-LR was set as the reference
Back to article page