Table 2 Optimization of dehydrogenative condensation of 1a and CH3OH.
Entry | n | Base | b [mL] | 2a [%] | 2b [%] | 3 [%] | H2 [%]d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6 | tBuOK | 0.4 | 86 | 9 | 5 | 92 (95.5%) |
2 | 8 | tBuOK | 0.4 | 86 | 5 | 8 | 89 (94.8%) |
3 | 4 | tBuOK | 0.4 | 80 | 13 | 7 | 85 (96.7%) |
4 | 6 | tBuONa | 0.4 | 30 | 22 | 46 | 48 (>99.9%) |
5 | 6 | KOMe | 0.4 | 85 | 10 | 5 | 90 (98.5%) |
6 | 6 | KOH | 0.4 | 71 | 14 | 15 | 80 (99.8%) |
7 | 6 | tBuOK | 0.2 | 77 | 8 | 15 | 82 (96.4%) |
8 | 6 | tBuOK | 0.6 | 86 | 11 | 3 | 90 (93.5%) |
9 | 6 | tBuOK | 1 | 77 | 17 | 5 | 88 (90.2%) |
10a | 6 | tBuOK | 0.4 | 76 | 14 | 7 | 84 (97.8%) |
11b | 6 | tBuOK | 0.4 | 97 | <1 | 2 | 98 (98.7%) |
12c | 6 | tBuOK | 0.4 | 93 | 5 | 2 | 90 (>99.9%) |
