Table 4 Anger, disgust, and endorsement of punishment motivations.

From: Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life

 

Estimate

t

df

p

Intercept

1.22

6.86

2814.86

<0.001

Verbal

−0.78

−3.62

4292.11

<0.001

Gossip

0.04

0.22

3679.08

0.824

Social exclusion

−0.35

−1.70

4145.23

0.088

Anger (person-centered)

0.19

4.79

970.36

<0.001

Verbal × anger (person-centered)

0.09

1.97

4756.23

0.049

Gossip × anger (person-centered)

0.05

1.05

4605.54

0.293

Social exclusion × anger (person-centered)

0.10

2.31

3992.02

0.021

Disgust (person-centered)

0.12

3.26

1175.49

0.001

Verbal × disgust (person-centered)

0.03

0.70

4633.02

0.483

Gossip × disgust (person-centered)

0.11

2.75

4533.95

0.006

Social exclusion × disgust (person-centered)

0.10

2.61

3873.57

0.009

  1. Results from a linear mixed model with punishment type, F(3, 3970.60) = 6.69, p < 0.001, anger, F(1, 372.55) = 67.16, p < 0.001, disgust, F(1, 450.90) = 42.18, p < 0.001, and the anger × punishment type, F(3, 4277.69) = 2.17, p = 0.089, and disgust × punishment type, F(3, 4166.67) = 3.79, p = 0.010, interactions as predictors of punishment motivations. The table shows parameter estimates from planned contrasts, without adjustments for multiple comparisons. All tests are two-sided. Physical confrontation motivations are used as the reference category. The model controls for gender and the gender × punishment type interaction. The model also includes effects of anger (person-average) and disgust (person-average), as well as the anger (person-average) × punishment type and disgust (person-average) × punishment type interactions. Results including person-average effects are available in Supplementary Table 5. Source data are provided as a Source data file.
Back to article page