Fig. 5: Performance comparison. | Nature Communications

Fig. 5: Performance comparison.

From: Reversible redox chemistry in azobenzene-based organic molecules for high-capacity and long-life nonaqueous redox flow batteries

Fig. 5

a Comparison of equivalent electron concentration demonstrated in electrochemical tests for AB (red) and various organic molecules in aqueous (blue) or nonaqueous (green) RFBs. b Comparison of demonstrated cycles and corresponding test time and capacity retention of AB (red) and various organic molecules in aqueous (blue) or nonaqueous (green) RFBs. DHPS (7,8-dihydroxyphenazine-2-sulfonic acid), 2,6-DBEAQ (4,4′-((9,10-anthraquinone-2,6-diyl)dioxy)dibutyrate), ACA (alloxazine 7/8-carboxylic acid), FMN-Na (flavin mononucleotide), MV (methyl viologen), FcNCl ((ferrocenylmethyl)trimethylammonium chloride), MB (methylene blue), TEMPTMA (N,N,N-2,2,6,6-heptamethylpiperidinyl oxy-4-ammonium chloride), TMAP-TEMPO (4-[3-(trimethylammonio)propoxy]-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine−1-oxyl chloride), MePh (N-methylphthalimide), FL (9-fluorenone), BzNSN (2,1,3-benzothiadiazole), DMFc (1,1-dimethylferrocene), TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetra-methylpiperidine-1-oxyl), Fc1N112-TFSI (ferrocenylmethyl dimethyl ethyl ammonium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide).

Back to article page