Fig. 4: IL-20 induced PD-L1 expression, and 7E neutralized IL-20-induced PD-L1 expression. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: IL-20 induced PD-L1 expression, and 7E neutralized IL-20-induced PD-L1 expression.

From: IL-20 antagonist suppresses PD-L1 expression and prolongs survival in pancreatic cancer models

Fig. 4

a Pancreatic tissue from an orthotopic PDAC model mouse was analyzed by immunofluorescence labeling of IL-20 (green) and PD-L1 (red). Nuclei (blue) were visualized by DAPI staining. Scale bar, 50 μm. b KPC cells were treated with IL-20 or IL-20 plus 7E, and the expression of PD-L1 in the KPC cells was analyzed using RT-PCR with specific primers. c KPC cells were treated with mIL-20 for the indicated time, and the fold increase in the expression of IFN-α was analyzed using RT-qPCR with specific primers (n = 1 strain of cell culturing; one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0488). d IFN-α mRNA expression (n = 1 strain of cell culturing; one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001) and e PD-L1 mRNA expression in KPC cells were analyzed after IL-20 treatment using RT-qPCR (n = 1 strain of cell culturing; one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0042). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001. KPC mice and orthotopic PDAC model mice were treated with 7E, and pancreatic tissue samples were analyzed for f PD-L1 (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001), g, h CD8, and PD-1 staining quantification. The rightmost panel shows the IgG-stained negative control. Scale bar, 50 μm. g CD8 and PD-1: one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001. h CD8 and PD-1: one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001. ****p < 0.001 compared with the mIgG-treated controls. KPC/Luc cells were injected into the pancreas of WT mice. PBS, mIgG, an anti-PD-1 antibody, 7E, or 7E + the anti-PD-1 antibody (n = 5) were injected (i.p.) into the mice twice per week for 28 days. i Analysis of tumor growth by using the in vivo luminescence activity of KPC/Luc cells on day 21. j, k Tumors were collected and weighed (n = 5; one-way ANOVA, p = 0.005). l Luciferase activity was measured on day 21 posttreatment and used to quantify tumor growth. m, n Tumors were harvested and analyzed (n = 5; one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001. Values represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (ch, k, n). The experiments in ce were repeated three times independently with similar results, and the data of one representative experiment are shown.

Back to article page