Fig. 3: Relative importance of predictors used in the animal and plant kingdom models. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Relative importance of predictors used in the animal and plant kingdom models.

From: Life history, climate and biogeography interactively affect worldwide genetic diversity of plant and animal populations

Fig. 3

An information theoretic approach was used to identify the most important predictors of animal (A) and plant (B) GDp, respectively. Predictors with relative importance higher than 50% (i.e. the relative cumulative Akaike weight for the set of models with ΔAIC < 4) are considered as significant contributors to GDp. Color code indicates “non-significant” predictors (RI < 50%, white bars), “significant” predictors not depending on phylum or on the relative position of the population (RI > 50%, black bars) and “significant” predictors depending either on phylum or on the relative position of the population (RI > 50%, grey bars). When bars are absent the relative importance of the predictor is 0%. Please see Tables S8 and S9 for all models with ΔAIC < 4. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page