Table 1 Asymptotic rates for existing experiments (data from Murta et al.18, Table 4).

From: Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis

Label

Experiment

Year

Rate [bit/channel use]

(1)

Matsukevich et al.64

Cold atom 2008

0.004

(2)

Pironio et al.65

Cold atom 2010

0.118

(3)

Giustina et al.66

Photonic 2013

0

(4)

Christensen et al.67

Photonic 2013

0

(5)

Giustina et al.15

Photonic 2015

0

(6)

Shalm et al.16

Photonic 2015

0

(7)

Hensen et al.14

NV-centre 2015

0.057

(8)

Rosenfeld et al.17

Cold atom 2017

0.019

(9)

Liu et al.68

Photonic 2018

0

(10)

Liu et al.69

Photonic 2019

0

(11)

Li et al.70

Photonic 2019

0

  1. Non-photonic experiments ((1, 2) and (7, 8)) now promise a positive keyrate. However, note that the experiments (1, 2) were performed in a single lab and therefore did not close the locality loophole. The photonic experiments (3, 4) also did not close the locality loophole. The more recent experiments (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) closed both locality and detection loopholes. Note that the value of QBER for experiment (8) provided by Murta et al.18 is based on the experiment of Henkel et al.63 while the QBER achievable by experiment (8) is estimated to be higher by the authors of experiment (8)17.