Fig. 2: Performance comparison of DDA and DIA on the fission yeast sample at the site-specific glycan level. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Performance comparison of DDA and DIA on the fission yeast sample at the site-specific glycan level.

From: GproDIA enables data-independent acquisition glycoproteomics with comprehensive statistical control

Fig. 2

a Numbers of identifications per run. “Full” represents identifications observed in all the runs; “shared 2/3 or 3/4” represents identifications observed in 2 of the 3 runs or 3 of the 4 runs; “shared 2/4” represents identifications observed in 2 of the 4 runs; “unique” represents identifications observed in only 1 run. b Numbers of cumulative identifications across runs. “Full” represents identifications shared in the cumulative runs; “sparse” represents identifications observed in at least one run in the cumulative runs. c Comparison of numbers of identifications shared in at least 2/3 or 3/4 runs using DDA with an 1 h LC gradient, DDA with a 6 h LC gradient, and DIA with an 1 h LC gradient. d Coefficients of variation (CVs) of quantification results. Medians are indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page