Fig. 7: Transendothelial thymic DCs capture blood-borne proteins. | Nature Communications

Fig. 7: Transendothelial thymic DCs capture blood-borne proteins.

From: Specialized transendothelial dendritic cells mediate thymic T-cell selection against blood-borne macromolecules

Fig. 7

a Uptake of Alexa 647-labeled ovalbumin (Ova-AF647) by thymic DCs. Different doses of Ova-AF647 were injected IV and thymic DCs were harvested 5 min later. n = 3 experiments with three mice/group for 0 and 1 μg, four mouse/group for 10, 50 100, and 200 μg. b Representative FACS plot of thymic DCs. In all, 5 min after IV co-injection of anti-CD11c-PE and 100 μg Ova-AF647, thymic single-cell suspensions were obtained and stained for CD11c+ DC. OVA-AF647 geometric mean fluorescence intensity (geoMFI) for PE+ subset (TE-DC) = 982 and for PEneg subset (Par-DC) = 75.1 (a.u.). c Frequency of thymic DCs that bound IV injected anti-CD11c-PE (PE+) and/or Ova-AF647. n = 2 independent experiments with five mice/group each, of which one representative experiment is shown (one-way ANOVA). d Subset analysis of thymic Par-DC (i.e., PEneg), PE+ DC (i.e., TE-DC) that did or did not acquire Ova-AF647. n = 2 independent experiments with 10 mice/group (two-way ANOVA). e Age and sex-matched wildtype (WT), Cx3cr1gfp/+, Cx3cr1gfp/gfp, and Cx3cl1–/– mice were injected with 100 µg Ova-AF647 and thymi were harvested 5 min later for FACS analysis of DCs. n = 2 experiments with five mice per group (one-way ANOVA). Bars and error bars represent mean ± SEM. c ****P < 0.0001; **P = 0.0011 (PE+Ova vs. PE+Ova+) and P = 0.0073 (PEOva+ vs. PE+Ova+). d ****P < 0.0001. e *P = 0.0217 (WT vs. Cx3cl1−/−) and P = 0.0172 (WT vs. Cx3cr1gfp/gfp), DCs dendritic cells, pDCs plasmacytoid dendritic cells.

Back to article page