Table 1 Within-group BMA coupling parameter statistics.

From: Altered predictive control during memory suppression in PTSD

  

df

Reactive control (PE+)

Predictive control (beliefs)

Predictive – reactive control

   

t

pFDR

Pp

95% CI

BF

t

pFDR

Pp

95% CI

BF

t

pFDR

Pp

95% CI

BF

Nonexposed

rHIP

71

−2.88

0.012*

0.999

[−0.37 −0.07]

9

−5.04

<0.001*

1

[−0.46 −0.21]

>1000

−0.98

0.178

0.884

[−0.31 0.10]

2.5

cHIP

71

−1.84

0.085

0.968

[−0.22 0.01]

108

−4.02

<0.001*

1

[−0.28 −0.16]

>1000

−1.77

0.068

0.989

[−0.41 0.01]

7.4

PC

71

−0.05

0.478

0.526

[−0.15 0.14]

1.76

−6.33

<0.001*

1

[−0.83 −0.44]

>1000

−4.51

<0.001*

1

[−0.90 −0.36]

>1000

wHIP

71

−2.83

0.012*

0.946

[−0.28 −0.05]

57

−5.58

<0.001*

1

[−0.43 −0.21]

>1000

−1.59

0.076

0.886

[−0.33 .04]

6.6

PTSD−

rHIP

45

−0.63

0.356

0.764

[−0.22 0.12]

3.6

−1.78

0.041*

0.998

[−0.46 0.05]

76

−1.09

0.168

0.943

[−0.48 0.15]

5.1

cHIP

45

−3.44

0.007*

1

[−0.62 −0.17]

103

−2.01

0.027*

0.994

[−0.35 −0.04]

6.4

1.66

0.076

0.977

[−0.03 0.47]

1.1

PC

45

0.54

0.356

0.800

[−0.14 0.28]

2.8

−4.55

<0.001*

1

[−0.88 −0.37]

>1000

−3.62

0.001*

1

[−1.1 −0.30]

9.1

wHIP

45

−2.60

0.019*

0.986

[−0.39 −0.06]

34

−2.21

0.019*

0.980

[−0.37 −0.02]

97.5

0.18

0.429

0.557

[−0.21 0.27]

1.8

PTSD+

rHIP

54

0.76

0.356

0.861

[−0.13 0.30]

1.1

−5.44

<0.001*

1

[−0.81 −0.38]

>1000

−3.62

0.001*

1

[−1.1 −0.32]

105

cHIP

54

0.43

0.362

0.790

[−0.16 0.29]

3.6

−4.93

<0.001*

1

[−0.66 −0.29]

>1000

−2.93

0.004*

1

[−0.89 −0.18]

3.8

PC

54

0.57

0.356

0.810

[−0.13 0.25]

1.15

−6.89

<0.001*

1

[−0.76 −0.43]

>1000

-4.54

<0.001*

1

[−0.93 −0.36]

>1000

wHIP

54

0.66

0.356

0.750

[−0.12 0.28]

1.6

−6.06

<0.001*

1

[−0.72 −0.38]

>1000

−3.61

0.001*

0.999

[−0.94 −0.30]

88

  1. We first explored the negative modulation of PE+ (reactive control) and beliefs (predictive control) during top-down suppression. We then compared PE+ and beliefs coupling parameters within each group, to gauge the imbalance between reactive and predictive control (right part of the table). For both analyses, we also report one-tailed t statistics, p values adjusted for false discovery rate correction (pFDR; see the “Methods” section), the posterior probability (Pp) of group mean being different from zero, the bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the mean, and the Bayes factor (BF). df degrees of freedom, rHIP rostral hippocampus, cHIP caudal hippocampus, PC precuneus, wHIP whole hippocampus. *Indicates significant effect as revealed by one-tailed t-tests at pFDR  <  0.05.