Fig. 4: The diagnostic ability of the identified PRS-associated frontal-temporal network.

a Group differences between SZ and HC of PRS-associated the positive and negative networks for independent BSNIP-1 (SZ: Nā=ā178; HC: Nā=ā220), COBRE (SZ: Nā=ā100; HC: Nā=ā90), fBIRN (SZ: Nā=ā164; HC: Nā=ā157) and MPRC (SZ: Nā=ā164; HC: Nā=ā157) cohorts, respectively. Two-tailed two-sample T test was used to calculate the group differences in (a). The minima, maxima and the mean were displayed in the box plots. b ROC curves of the classification results between SZ and HC for BSNIP-1, COBRE, fBIRN and MPRC cohorts, respectively. The classification accuracies were approximated as around 50% as a random distributed accuracy when treating site as categories (the more number of sites the lower classification accuracy, Supplementary Fig.Ā 16), indicating that site was not a major confounding factor for the current SZ-HC classification analysis. AUC area under the curve, ACC accuracy.