Fig. 4: The structure of SspER100A and conformational changes in SspE. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: The structure of SspER100A and conformational changes in SspE.

From: Nicking mechanism underlying the DNA phosphorothioate-sensing antiphage defense by SspE

Fig. 4

a The structure of SspER100A was determined, and one of the four monomers in one asymmetric unit is displayed. b Structural superimposition of the wild-type SspE structure (slate) with SspER100A (cyan) to show that CTD exhibits en bloc movement toward the NTD. The DNA binding region of SspER100A is highlighted in red. The distance between the R404- and R408-containing helix and the NTD in SspER100A is greater than that in SspE. c The “open” and “closed” conformational states of SspE by normal mode analysis. The DNA binding region of SspE in the closed conformational state is highlighted in red. d A schematic representation describing the FRET changes of YFP-SspE-CFP in the closed-to-open transition. In the closed state, FRET occurs from excited CFP to YFP, leading to light emission from YFP at 530 nm. GTP hydrolysis causes a conformational change in SspE, leading to reduced emission from YFP and increased emission from CFP at 480 nm. e Spectra of FRET monitoring of YFP-SspE-CFP in vitro in the absence or presence of PT-DNA and/or GTP (left panel). FRET was expressed as the emission ratio of CFP to YFP signals (right panel). Data and error bars represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired two-sided Student t tests; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and NS, not significant. f FRET analysis of YFP-SspEK40A-CFP in vitro. FRET was reported as the emission ratio of CFP to YFP signals. Data and error bars represent the means ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired two-sided Student t tests; *P <  0.05, **P <  0.01, and NS, not significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page