Fig. 2: Comparisons of TAPE-seq prediction results with those from GUIDE-seq and nDigenome-seq. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Comparisons of TAPE-seq prediction results with those from GUIDE-seq and nDigenome-seq.

From: TAPE-seq is a cell-based method for predicting genome-wide off-target effects of prime editor

Fig. 2

a–j Venn diagrams showing the number of and overlap between off-target loci predicted by nDigenome-seq, GUIDE-seq, and TAPE-seq and validated off-target sites for a HEK4 (+2 G to T), b HEK4 (+3 TAA ins), c EMX1 (+5 G to T), d FANCF (+6 G to C), e HEK3 (+1 CTT ins), f RNF2 (+6 G to A), g DNMT1 (+6 G to C), h HBB (+4 A to T), i RUNX1 (+6 G to C), and j VEGFA (+5 G to T) pegRNAs. k The number of off-target sites missed by nDigenome-seq (n = 10 independent experiments each represented by different color), GUIDE-seq (n = 6 independent experiments each represented by different color), and TAPE-seq (n = 10 independent experiments each represented by different color). Some numbers have been underlined to differentiate neighboring numbers (g, h, j). The bars represent the mean. Error bars indicate standard deviation (k).

Back to article page