Table 1 Clinical and molecular backgrounds of the RS subtypes

From: Oncogenic structural aberration landscape in gastric cancer genomes

subtype

st.RS1

st.RS2

st.RS3

st.RS4

st.RS5

st.RS6

st.RS2/6

Characteristic

SV features

Small-deletion

Sparse-small

SVs

Tandem-duplication

Large-deletion

Translocation

Dense-large SVs

Both RS2 and RS6 dominate

No. member

7

61

27

7

12

16

38

No.SV

-

5.0✕10−9

7.2✕10−9

-

-

-

1.2✕10−4

No. mutation*1

-

-

-

-

-

4.6✕10−2

-

WGD

-

1.2✕10−2

4.4✕10−4

1.0✕10−12

-

-

-

SCNA

-

-

4.1✕10−2

-

-

-

-

Diffuse type

-

-

-

 

1.7✕10−2

-

-

7.7✕10−4

Intestinal type

-

-

9.1✕10−3

-

-

-

2.3✕10−4

Smoking

-

-

4.1✕10−3

-

-

-

-

Age

-

-

5.2✕10−3

-

-

-

-

Stage*2: I/II

-

-

-

-

-

1.3✕10−2

3.0✕10−2

Stage: IV

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.2✕10−2

ΔMMR*3

-

7.2✕10−7

-

-

-

-

 

No.Kataegis

-

2.5✕10−2

3.0✕10−5

1.3✕10−2

-

3.1✕10−2

-

No.Omkili

2.1✕10−2

-

4.6✕10−2

-

-

-

-

ΔSMG*4

-

ACVR2A, PIK3CA,

RNF43, ARID1A,

ERBB2, TP53,

B2M, MAP2K7,

PTEN, MUC6,

ARID2, KRAS

TP53

TGFBR2, ELF3

-

-

-

  1. WGD Whole-genome doubling, SCNA Somatic copy number alterations, MMR Mismatch repair, SMG significantly mutated genes.
  2. The upward and downward arrowheads appended to each P-value indicate the increments and declinations observed in the target group, respectively. P values were calculated using two-sided Welch’s t-tests (No. SV, No.mutation, WGD, SCNA, Age, No. Kataegis, and No. Omikili) or two-sided Fisher exact tests (diffuse and intestinal type, smoking habit, stage, and mutation of MMR/SMG). Items that did not show significant differences (P > 0.05) were excluded.
  3. *1: 24 cases of hypermutation were considered outliers and excluded from Welch’s t-test.
  4. *2: UICC tumor stage classification.
  5. *3: ΔMMR refers to mutations in MLH-1/3, MSH-2/3/6, and PMS-1/2.
  6. *4: SMG are defined by Totoki. et al. 15 from non-hypermutated cases of gastric cancer.