Fig. 2: Lrig1 is required for the suppressive population of Treg and Th17 cells.

a Suppressive potential of CD4+Lrig1+ cells, CD4+Lrig1− cells, or CD4+GFP+ cells (Foxp3+) toward eFlour 670-labeled effector T cells with a different ratio. Effector only or CD4+Foxp3+ T cells: n = 4, CD4+Lrig1+ T cells or CD4+Lrig1− T cells: n = 5. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (in ratio 4:1 *P = 0.02, **P = 0.007; in ratio 1:1 *P = 0.01, **P = 0.002, ***P < 0.001). b The level of IL-10 in the culture medium of total splenocytes, activated CD4+ T cells, CD4+Foxp3+ T cells, or CD4+Lrig1+ or Lrig1− T cells in mouse spleen (n = 3). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (*P = 0.03, ***P < 0.001). c Representative images (left) and quantification (right) of suppression activity of CD4+Foxp3+Lrig1hi or CD4+Foxp3+Lrig1low T cells expressing a similar level of Foxp3 (n = 6). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (***P < 0.001). d, e Comparison of the suppressive activity of Lrig1+ and Lrig1− cells from mouse Th17, iTreg, Th0, or Th1 cells (d) (n = 3) or mouse Lrig1+ and Lrig1− cells from CD25−CCR6+ T cells or CD25+ T cells in the splenocytes (e) (n = 3). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (in d 2:1 ratio, ***P < 0.0001 Lrig1− Th17 vs Lrig1+ Th17, ***P = 0.0003 Lrig1− iTreg vs Lrig1+ iTreg; 1:1 ratio, *P = 0.012, ***P = 0.0007; 1:2 ratio, *P = 0.0127, **P = 0.0099; in e ***P < 0.0001). f The suppressive potential of human LRIG1+ and LRIG1− cells from human blood differentiated Th17 or iTreg cells (n = 3). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (*P = 0.0479 LRIG1− Th17 vs LRIG1+ Th17, *P = 0.0471 LRIG1− iTreg vs LRIG1+ iTreg, **P = 0.0014 LRIG1− Th17 vs LRIG1+ Th17, **P = 0.0032 LRIG1− iTreg vs LRIG1+ iTreg). Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (b) or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (a, c–f). All experiments were repeated at least three times. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.