Fig. 2: Results from literature review of 100 highly cited cross-national studies of economic development (red) and cultural values (blue).
From: Cross-national analyses require additional controls to account for the non-independence of nations
a Proportion of articles containing at least one analysis accounting for non-independence, overall and split by common methods of controlling for non-independence. Points represent raw proportions of articles, and ranges represent two-tailed 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (n = 1000 bootstrap samples). b The association between journal impact factor and the probability that an article contains at least one analysis accounting for non-independence. c Estimated trend over time for the probability that an article contains at least one analysis accounting for non-independence. Lines and shaded areas are posterior median regression lines and equal-tailed 50% credible intervals from Bayesian logistic regression models (n = 100 observations). Dots represent raw counts of individual articles that did (top) or did not (bottom) account for non-independence. Region FEs region fixed effects.
