Fig. 3: Response of m6A-modified NCOA4 mRNA in PBMCs from non-human primates (NHPs) and human cells exposed to radiation. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Response of m6A-modified NCOA4 mRNA in PBMCs from non-human primates (NHPs) and human cells exposed to radiation.

From: RNA N6-methyladenosine modification-based biomarkers for absorbed ionizing radiation dose estimation

Fig. 3

a Homology analysis of m6A methylated sites and conserved motifs around these sites in Ncoa4/NCOA4 mRNA among different species. Schematic representation of m6A sites and correspondingly primers designed to investigate the m6A levels of NCOA4 mRNA with exposure to radiation in NHPs (b) and human cells (c). d Validation of primers specificity and measurement of RNA m6A levels of NCOA4 mRNA by MeRIP-qPCR in PBMCs from adult NHP gamma-ray TBI model (n = 6). e Validation of primers specificity and measurement of RNA m6A levels of NCOA4 mRNA by MeRIP-qPCR in HUVECs exposed to 10 Gy gamma rays at 1 h post-irradiation, using unirradiated samples as control group (n = 3). f The relative m6A levels of NCOA4 mRNAs in PBMCs from adult NHP gamma-ray TBI model exposed to 6.75 Gy gamma rays at 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post-irradiation, using PBMCs from the unirradiated NHPs as control group (n = 6). g Temporal responding curves of the relative m6A levels of NCOA4 mRNA in HUVECs with various doses of gamma rays (0.2 to 10 Gy) and post-irradiation time (1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h) (n = 3/group, 49 groups). h The expression levels of NCOA4 in HUVECs with various doses of gamma rays (0.2 to 10 Gy) exposure at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h and without irradiation (n = 3/group, 49 groups). i Temporal responding curves of the relative m6A levels of NCOA4 mRNA in human peripheral blood cells with different doses of gamma rays (0.2 to 10 Gy) in vitro and post-irradiation time (1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h) (n = 3/group, 41 groups). Data in a and e are presented as means ± SD and analyzed by two-sided Student’s t test. MeRIP-qPCR assays in f–i were conducted using NCOA4 primer 3. For data in f and h, one-way ANOVA was applied, and adjusted by Dunnett’s method. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Source data are provided.

Back to article page