Fig. 1: Inconsistency of the decay theory based on Equations (6) and (9) with observational constraints for EWPT-generated PMFs. | Nature Communications

Fig. 1: Inconsistency of the decay theory based on Equations (6) and (9) with observational constraints for EWPT-generated PMFs.

From: Cosmic-void observations reconciled with primordial magnetogenesis

Fig. 1

Purple regions denote values of \(\tilde{B}\) and λB excluded on physical [\({\tilde{\rho }}_{B}(t)\, \lesssim \, {\tilde{\rho }}_{\gamma }({t}_{*})\)] or observational [the two forms of the constraint (1)] grounds. Under decays that conserve \({I}_{{{{{{{{{\bf{L}}}}}}}}}_{M}}\) [Equation (4)], \(\tilde{B}\) and λB evolve along lines parallel to the ones shown in blue. The predicted values of modern-day \(\tilde{B}\) and λB are given by the intersection of these lines with Equation (10). We see that even PMFs generated with \({\tilde{\rho }}_{B}({t}_{*}) \sim {\tilde{\rho }}_{\gamma }({t}_{*})\) and λB(t*) ~ rH(t*) produce modern-day relics that are inconsistent with Equation (1).

Back to article page