Fig. 3: Relative efficiency of geographic pair matching across resampled trials of varying size.
From: Geographic pair matching in large-scale cluster randomized trials
a Relative efficiency of geographic pair matching compared with an unmatched design by number of geographically proximate matched pairs in the Bangladesh trial. Lines represent mean relative efficiency over 1000 bootstrap resampled subsets of geographically proximate matched pairs in samples ranging from 10 to 90 pairs. Outcome labels in each panel are ordered and colored by relative efficiency with 90 pairs. b Similar estimates of mean relative efficiency over 1000 bootstrap resampled subsets of different sizes in the Kenya trial, ranging from subsamples of 10 to 72 pairs. MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI) comprehension and expression were only measured in the Bangladesh trial. Created with notebook https://osf.io/n276c.
