Table 3 Performance comparison between LiAIDS and radiologists on detection and diagnosis of FLLs
From: A multicenter clinical AI system study for detection and diagnosis of focal liver lesions
Approach | Recall of detection | Accuracy | Benign lesions | Malignant lesions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sen | Spe | F1-score | Sen | Spe | F1-score | |||
Junior1 | 0.766 | 0.727 | 0.767 | 0.361 | 0.830 | 0.361 | 0.767 | 0.230 |
Junior2 | 0.883 | 0.810 | 0.857 | 0.452 | 0.890 | 0.452 | 0.857 | 0.360 |
Junior3 | 0.796 | 0.767 | 0.804 | 0.494 | 0.860 | 0.494 | 0.804 | 0.330 |
Senior1 | 0.911 | 0.905 | 0.937 | 0.663 | 0.950 | 0.663 | 0.937 | 0.620 |
Senior2 | 0.911 | 0.870 | 0.894 | 0.688 | 0.920 | 0.688 | 0.894 | 0.550 |
Senior3 | 0.962 | 0.907 | 0.931 | 0.729 | 0.950 | 0.729 | 0.931 | 0.650 |
Junior1+LiAIDS | 0.97 | 0.893 | 0.899 | 0.854 | 0.936 | 0.854 | 0.899 | 0.680 |
Junior2+LiAIDS | 0.954 | 0.907 | 0.933 | 0.734 | 0.946 | 0.734 | 0.933 | 0.671 |
Junior3+LiAIDS | 0.965 | 0.904 | 0.931 | 0.728 | 0.944 | 0.728 | 0.931 | 0.667 |
Senior1+LiAIDS | 0.975 | 0.932 | 0.957 | 0.771 | 0.961 | 0.771 | 0.957 | 0.753 |
Senior2+LiAIDS | 0.969 | 0.913 | 0.946 | 0.695 | 0.950 | 0.695 | 0.946 | 0.679 |
Senior3+LiAIDS | 0.972 | 0.927 | 0.953 | 0.750 | 0.958 | 0.750 | 0.953 | 0.727 |
LiAIDS | 0.965 | 0.900 | 0.900 | 0.900 | 0.940 | 0.900 | 0.900 | 0.692 |