Fig. 2: Comparison of environmental coverage analyses. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Comparison of environmental coverage analyses.

From: Reply to: Field experiments show no consistent reductions in soil microbial carbon in response to warming

Fig. 2

Results of the unified environmental coverage analysis for 200 bootstrap random forest models simulated by Yue et al.2 using (a) the dataset from Patoine et al.1 (n = 762), and (b) the combined dataset including additional sites (n = 762 + 106). The area of applicability calculated by Patoine et al. of 2.63 M pixel locations is shown as comparison. The unified high confidence locations for Yue et al. correspond to 1.15 M and 1.14 M pixel locations, respectively for (a) and (b), equivalent to ca. 56% of the original coverage.

Back to article page