Fig. 7: moDCs comprise three different subsets that are defined by characteristic protein expression profiles and differential susceptibilities to HCMV infection.

moDCs were differentiated from 16 independent donors, CLEC12A, CD1a, CD86, CCL18, CCL17, CCL22, CD115, CD88 and CD85d were immunolabeled and analyzed by flow cytometry. a UMAP of live cells showing heatmap coloring to indicate the abundance of each of the immunolabeling markers, data of one representative donor are shown. b Mock-treated moDCs were immunolabeled as described above and the three moDC subsets were discriminated by gating of CD1a−/CD86− (M1, blue dots), CD1a+ (M2, red dots) and CD86+ (M3, green dots) cells. c Frequencies and d relative fluorescence intensities (RFI) of each of the analyzed markers in the three subset gates were determined. Data represents mean ± SEM of 16 different donors from 7 independent experiments. Each dot represents a single donor. ****p < 0.0001, *p = 0.0182 using two-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test (c) and ****p < 0.0001 (CD1a, CD86), ***p = 0.0010 (CCL17, CCL18), p = 0.0003 (CLEC12A), p = 0.0005 (CCL18, CCL22), **p = 0.0039 (CD115), p = 0.0093 (CCL18), 0.0020 (CD85d), p = 0.0015 (CCL17, CCL22), *p = 0.0137 (CD88) using two-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test (d). e moDCs were infected with HCMV-NG, immunolabeled and analyzed as in a. UMAP of NG fluorescence and the 3 most discriminative moDC subset markers, i.e., CD1a, CD86, and CLEC12A. Insets show the expression of the above-mentioned markers only in the NG+ cluster. f Mock-treated moDC subsets were sorted using the gating strategy shown in (b) and analyzed morphologically (scale bar 50 µm). moDC cultures (g) or sorted moDCs (h) as described in b were infected with HCMV-NG and percentages of NG+ cells were determined 24 hpe. Data represents mean ± SEM of 6 different donors from 3 independent experiments. Each dot represents a single donor. *p = 0.0313 using two-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test (g) and ± SEM of 3 different donors from 1 experiment. Each dot represents a single donor. i Quantification of STING protein expression from the subsets described in b. Data represents mean ± SEM of 7 different donors from 4 independent experiments. Each dot represents a single donor. *p = 0.0469 (M2 vs. M1), p = 0.0156 (M3 vs. M2), and p = 0.0313 (M3 vs. M1) using two-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test.