Table 1 Base-case cost-effectiveness and cost-utility results of different screening strategies in urban and rural settings

From: Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a digital technology-driven hierarchical healthcare screening pattern in China

     

Cost-utility

  

Cost-effectiveness

 
 

Comparison screening interval for ICER calculation

        
 

Costs per person, $

QALYs per person

Incremental costs per 100,000 people screened, $

Incremental QALYs per 100,000 people screened

ICURs (95% CI), $

Years of blindness per person

Years of blindness avoided per 100,000 people screened

ICERs (95% CI), $

Urban

No screening

\

2236

14.31732

\

\

\

0.40993

\

\

Telescreening

No screening

2215

14.33164

−2,099,312

1433

Dominating

0.39921

1073

Dominating

AI screening

No screening

2197

14.33589

−3,806,182

1858

Dominating

0.39605

1389

Dominating

DH screening

No screening

2189

14.33654

−4,628,416

1923

Dominating

0.39556

1438

Dominating

 

Telescreening

\

\

−2,529,104

490

Dominating

\

365

Dominating

 

AI screening

\

\

−822,234

65

Dominating

\

49

Dominating

Rural

No screening

\

2913

13.65998

\

\

\

0.56266

\

\

Telescreening

No screening

2806

13.70500

−10,708,193

4503

Dominating

0.52060

4205

Dominating

AI screening

No screening

2750

13.71655

−16,372,083

5658

Dominating

0.50991

5275

Dominating

DH screening

No screening

2737

13.71855

−17,608,255

5857

Dominating

0.50804

5462

Dominating

 

Telescreening

\

\

−6,900,061

1354

Dominating

\

1256

Dominating

 

AI screening

\

\

−1,236,171

199

Dominating

\

187

Dominating

  1. Costs are expressed in US dollars. Costs, QALYs, and years of blindness are defined as lifetime values per person. Incremental costs, incremental QALYs, ICURs, years of blindness avoided, and ICERs are defined as values per 100,000 people. The ICER thresholds of cost-effectiveness are $31,656 and $41,757 per QALY gained for rural and urban settings, respectively. The ICER thresholds of being highly cost-effective are $10,552 and $13,919 per QALY gained for rural and urban settings, respectively. Negative ICUR or ICER is defined as dominating. ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. QALYs quality-adjusted life-years, ICUR incremental cost-utility ratio, DH screening digital hierarchical screening.