Table 2 Anisotropy data for secretin probes bound to WT and mutant SecR

From: Impact of secretin receptor homo-dimerization on natural ligand binding

Probes

Control

+GppNHp

Comparison

Control vs +GppNHp, P values

Comparison

WT vs mutant, P values

20 °C

37 °C

20 °C

37 °C

20 °C

37 °C

20 °C

37 °C

SecR WT

 Alexa488-Sec

0.15 ± 0.01

0.08 ± 0.01

0.17 ± 0.01

0.07 ± 0.01

0.190

0.918

  

 (Lys13-Alexa488)-Sec

0.14 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.01

0.20 ± 0.02*

0.12 ± 0.01*

0.046

0.044

  

 (Lys22-Alexa488)-Sec

0.14 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.01

0.20 ± 0.02**

0.12 ± 0.01*

0.004

0.011

  

 Sec-Gly28-(Cys29-Alexa488)

0.13 ± 0.01

0.08 ± 0.01

0.13 ± 0.01

0.08 ± 0.01

0.999

0.999

  

SecR(G264A, I268A)

 Alexa488-Sec

0.19 ± 0.01#

0.1 ± 0.01

0.18 ± 0.01

0.1 ± 0.01

0.960

0.982

0.0163

0.266

 (Lys13-Alexa488)-Sec

0.18 ± 0.02#

0.11 ± 0.01

0.20 ± 0.01

0.11 ± 0.01

0.749

0.959

0.0477

0.102

 (Lys22 -Alexa488)-Sec

0.18 ± 0.01##

0.10 ± 0.01#

0.19 ± 0.01

0.12 ± 0.01

0.635

0.229

0.005

0.0230

 Sec-Gly28-(Cys29-Alexa488)

0.13 ± 0.01

0.09 ± 0.01

0.15 ± 0.01

0.1 ± 0.01

0.331

0.748

0.968

0.565

  1. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. from three independent sets of observations analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test.
  2. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01, significantly different from control at the same receptor construct, #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01, significantly different from analogous condition at WT SecR.