Fig. 4: Comparison with other tools. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: Comparison with other tools.

From: Identifying small-molecules binding sites in RNA conformational ensembles with SHAMAN

Fig. 4

From left to right, boxplots reporting the predictive quality of different binding site prediction tools evaluated by four statistical metrics for binary classifiers (Methods). A Binding site prediction on the holo-like systems (Tab. S1, red column, sample size n = 7) validated against the single corresponding experimental structure. B, C Binding site prediction on holo-like (B) and apo (C) systems (Tab. S1, red and cyan columns) against all the validation structures (Tab. S3 and S4, Methods, sample size n = 69). Each box represents the interquartile range between the first and third quartiles, with the median indicated by a horizontal black line. Outliers are marked as black diamonds.

Back to article page