Fig. 3: Incident rate ratios for predicted plant abundance. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Incident rate ratios for predicted plant abundance.

From: Seed dispersal by Martu peoples promotes the distribution of native plants in arid Australia

Fig. 3

Dot and whisker plots on the left show the strength of each predictor variable as an incident rate ratio with 95% CI for the best abundance model for each species (see values in Table 6). Red values are negative (below 1), blue are positive (above 1). Coefficients have been standardized to 2 sd, so that an IRR of 0.5 means that a 2 sd increase in the value of the predictor decreases stem counts by two times; an IRR of 2 increases stem counts by two times. Confidence intervals for IRRs that cross the line at 1 are non-significant. IRRs for interaction terms (e.g., Season × Fire Freq) are to be interpreted with caution. Since this analysis predicts stem counts only when plants are present in the plot, sample size (plots present) for each species varies: SDIV(n)  =  109, SCENT(n) = 709, ERAG(n) = 617, SCAV(n) = 177. The inset line graph (right) shows the predicted abundance (with 95% CI) and interactions for the strongest predictor.

Back to article page