Table 1 Comparison of optoacoustic (OptA) detectors for potential miniaturized OptA implementations (see Supplementary Note 1 for details on parameter calculations)

From: Bragg grating etalon-based optical fiber for ultrasound and optoacoustic detection

Detector

Configuration

Resolution-related specifications

Sensitivity

Size

BW [MHz]

Aperture size [µm]

Resolution [lateral × axial, µm]

NEPD [mPa.Hz−1/2]

Footprint diameter [mm]

Piezoelectric Detectors

IV PZT11

27

Ø 500

500 ×45

450

Ø 1

High-frequency IV PZT52

170

Ø 45

40 ×14

n/a

Ø 1

Focused PZT5,53,54

180

Ø 15

18 ×4

1.8–2.6

>Ø 3

Micromachined Detectors

PMUT array55,56

7

100 ×80

1000 ×500

0.5

Ø 1.1

CMUT array57

27

25 ×25

251 ×92

1.8

Ø 1.4

Transparent Detectors

Transparent PZT58

42

Ø 130

133 ×29

Ø 9

Polymer microring59,60,61

170

Ø 60

114 ×57

2.1

Ø 2

Silicon Photonics Detectors

Etalon (SWED)22,23

230

0.5 ×0.2

16 ×5

9

> Ø 1

Bragg grating12

230

30 ×0.5

16 ×13

9.8

> Ø 1

Optomechanic ring13

36

Ø 20

38 ×33

1.3

> Ø 1

Chalcogenide ring62

220

Ø 40

50 ×44

2.2

Ø 2

Optical Fiber Detectors

Fabry–Perot (single)15

28

Ø 30

94 ×66

2.1

Ø 0.125

Fabry–Perot (array)16

50

Ø 30

45 ×31

111–282

Ø 3

Pi-shifted FBG14,63

80

270 ×10

270 ×15

25

Ø 0.125

EER (sensor herein)

160

Ø 10

14 ×8.5

2.5

Ø 0.125

  1. BW Bandwidth, CMUT Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer, EER Embedded Etalon Resonator, FBG Fiber Bragg Grating, IV Intravascular, NEPD Noise Equivalent Pressure Density, PMUT Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer, PZT Piezoelectric Transducer, SWED Silicon Waveguide Etalon Detector.