Fig. 2: Comparison of BELA models with other models. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Comparison of BELA models with other models.

From: Automatic ploidy prediction and quality assessment of human blastocysts using time-lapse imaging

Fig. 2

Mean AUC scores and standard deviation for day-5 video, BELA, and embryologist-annotated BS-trained models are shown across 4 replicates (four-fold cross-validation) (n = 4). Performances are shown on both the WCM-Embryoscope and WCM-Embryoscope+ datasets for both EUP vs ANU and EUP vs CxA prediction tasks. a Performances of models without maternal age. b Performances of models with maternal age. Statistical significance was performed using a two-sided t-test, where we compared the performance of two different settings at a time. Significance (*) is shown if p-value < 0.05. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page