Fig. 3: Pathologists’ blind evaluation of brightfield Congo-red stain image quality (virtually stained vs. histochemically stained). | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Pathologists’ blind evaluation of brightfield Congo-red stain image quality (virtually stained vs. histochemically stained).

From: Virtual birefringence imaging and histological staining of amyloid deposits in label-free tissue using autofluorescence microscopy and deep learning

Fig. 3

A total of 163 image patches are evaluated, each by 3 pathologists. The scores are given for four metrics where their distributions are shown in violin plots in (a). The mean and standard deviation values (as error bars) are plotted for each individual pathologist in part (b). Source data of pathologists’ scores are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page