Fig. 1: Behavioral analysis of Go-Nogo task. | Nature Communications

Fig. 1: Behavioral analysis of Go-Nogo task.

From: Lateral prefrontal theta oscillations causally drive a computational mechanism underlying conflict expectation and adaptation

Fig. 1

A Single-trial example of reaction time and model variables. B Go-Nogo Task. C Reaction time comparison between the first Go trials (early) and the last Go trial (late) of a sequence (n = 30 participants, Wilcoxon test, two-sided, p = 8.8e-5). Boxplots display the extreme values, interquartile range, and median, and each point representing the mean for an individual subject. D Models comparison. E Posterior distribution of model parameters (Bayesian hypothesis test using pMCMC, two-sided, p < 0.001). Black dots represent the mean of the distribution, and black lines represent the 95% high-density intervals. The colored areas represent the complete posterior distribution. * indicates p < 0.05, **p < 0.01,***p < 0.001.CE commission error, DIC deviance information criteria, Ex conflict expectation, OE omission error. pCE previous commission error, pOE previous omission error, RT reaction time. See also Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. Source data are provided as a SourceData file.

Back to article page