Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12105, published online 05 July 2016

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 2 and Fig. 7. In Fig.2b the anti-GST blot was inadvertently re-used from a previous publication by these authors1. In Fig 7., the cell cycle profile of ‘siRAD18’ was inadvertently duplicated as ‘siMAGEA4’.

The correct version of Fig. 2 is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

The correct version of Fig. 7 is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.