Fig. 4: Urea permeation mechanism of the human urea transporter hUT-A2. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: Urea permeation mechanism of the human urea transporter hUT-A2.

From: Structural insights into the mechanisms of urea permeation and distinct inhibition modes of urea transporters

Fig. 4

a The urea transport channel of hUT-A2 is highlighted by blue dotted line with the inner urea molecules displayed as stick-balls. b The hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions of urea in the urea transport channel of hUT-A2. The black dashed lines are used to separate So, Sm, and Si regions of the channel. The H-bond are shown as red dashed line and the cation-π interaction are shown as purple dashed lines. c Free energy surface (FES) of urea within the hUT-A2 channel. The simulation reveals three distinct low-energy states, which are characterized by prolonged urea residence times across defined regions within the channel and corresponds to the So, Sm, and Si regions respectively. d Simplified one-dimensional energy landscape highlighting the So, Sm, and Si states of urea within the hUT-A2 channel. e Metadynamics analysis depicts urea dynamically transitioning between three states-So, Sm, and Si-within the hUT-A2 channel, with distribution probabilities of 37%, 19%, and 34%, respectively. fh Metadynamics simulations elucidate the passage of urea through the Sm region. This process involves a rotation of approximately 40°in the side chains of T1765a and T3385b, facilitating the rearrangement of T1765a–T3385b side chains (f). Notably, hydrogen bond formations between urea and specific residues, including T3385b and T1765a, are depicted (g). The rotation of side chains of T338/T176 and structural rearrangement of L127/L291 form a hydrophobic cavity in the Sm region, guiding urea transportation across the channel (h). The H-bond are shown as red dashed line. The blue arrows indicate the direction of movement of the urea molecule. i Urea permeability shown by the detection of remaining 14C-labeled urea in cell transfected with different hUT-A2. plasmids are shown as gray and green columns respectively, while cells transfected with pcDNA3.1 blank plasmids for control are shown as blank column. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from 3 independent experiments (n = 3). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, statistical differences were determined by the two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test (compared with wild type). j Schematic diagram of urea permeation mechanism of hUT-A2.

Back to article page