Table 2 Usability comparison with the conventional devices
From: Multi-point sensing organic light-emitting diode display based mobile cardiovascular monitor
| Â | Conventional device | Sensor OLED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVD monitor | Device | CVD monitors | Device | Smartphone (sensor OLED based) | ||
Sensing time | 5–10 min | |||||
Usability | Restricted access (only at the hospital) | |||||
BP monitor | Single point | Device | Cuff devices | Smartwatches | ||
Sensing time | 30–60 s | ~30 s | Sensing time | 15 s | ||
Usability | Restricted access (require cuff devices) | Without restrictions (require smartwatches) | ||||
Dual point | Device | Dual-cuff BP monitors | ||||
Sensing time | 30–60 s | |||||
Usability | Restricted access (only at the hospital) | Usability | Without restrictions (time, place, cost, etc. support truly ubiquitous sensing) | |||
High-resolution dynamic image | Device | Vascular Doppler detectors | ||||
Usability | Restricted access (only at the hospital) | |||||
Arrhythmia, PRV, HR, RR monitor | Device | Standalone devices, Smartwatches | ||||
Usability | Without restrictions (require standalone devices or smartwatches) | |||||
