Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56508-3, published online 6 February 2025

In the main body of this article the following sentence currently reads, ‘the opposite pattern was identified pre- (Mean ΔRT = 5 ms, s.d., = 15) and post- (Mean ΔRT = −1 ms, s.d., = 12) clean air exposure’ and should read ‘the opposite pattern was identified pre- (Mean ΔRT = 5 ms, s.d., = 15) and post- (Mean ΔRT = 1 ms, s.d., = 12) clean air exposure’. The original article has been corrected.