Table 2 Comparison and pairwise test for the cancer detection rate and recall rate
Reading | Cancer number | CDR (‰) | Rate (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRs without AI | 123 | 5.01 | 5.01 (4.13, 5.89) | ||
BRs with AI | 140 | 5.70 | 5.70 (4.76, 6.65) | ||
AI standalone | 128 | 5.21 | 5.21 (4.31, 6.12) | ||
GRs without AI | 95 | 3.87 | 3.87 (3.09, 4.65) | ||
GRs with AI | 120 | 4.89 | 4.89 (4.02, 5.76) | ||
Pairwise comparison | Est | p-value | |||
CDR (‰) | BRa without AI (5.01) vs BRa with AI (5.70) | −0.67 (−1.02, −0.36) | <0.001 | ||
AI standalone (5.21) vs BRa without AI (5.01) | 0.20 (−1.06, 1.47) | 0.752 | |||
AI standalone (5.21) vs BRa with AI (5.70) | −0.49 (−1.79, 0.81) | 0.462 | |||
GRb without AI (3.87) vs GRb with AI (4.89) | −1.02 (−1.46, −0.57) | <0.001 | |||
AI standalone (5.21) vs GRb without AI (3.87) | 1.34 (0.15, 2.53) | 0.027 | |||
AI standalone (5.21) vs GRb with AI (4.89) | 0.33 (−0.93, 1.58) | 0.611 | |||
Reading | Cancer number | RR (%) | Rate (95% CI) | ||
BRs without AI | 1100 | 4.48 | 4.48 (4.22, 4.74) | ||
BRs with AI | 1113 | 4.53 | 4.53 (4.27, 4.79) | ||
AL standalone | 1535 | 6.25 | 6.25 (5.95, 6.56) | ||
GRs without AI | 1548 | 6.31 | 6.31 (6, 6.61) | ||
GRs with AI | 1690 | 6.89 | 6.89 (6.57, 7.2) | ||
Pairwise comparison | Est | p-value | |||
RR (%) | BRa without AI (4.48) vs BRa with AI (4.53) | −0.05 (−0.23, 0.13) | 0.564 | ||
AI standalone (6.25) vs BRa without AI (4.48) | 1.77 (1.37, 2.17) | <0.001 | |||
AI standalone (6.25) vs BRa with AI (4.53) | 1.72 (1.32, 2.12) | <0.001 | |||
GRb without AI (6.31) vs GRb with AI (6.89) | −0.58 (−0.77, −0.39) | <0.001 | |||
AI standalone (6.25) vs GRb without AI (6.31) | −0.05 (−0.48, 0.38) | 0.809 | |||
AI standalone (6.25) vs GRb with AI (6.89) | −0.63 (−1.07, −0.17) | 0.005 | |||
