Table 1 Comparison of some GMO regulatory steps

From: Engineering biology applications for environmental solutions: potential and challenges

Regulatory steps

Explanation

UK

EU

USA

Pre-development risk assessment

Assessment of potential risks of R&D to human health and the environment

Conducted by developers, sometimes with assessment by SACGM, ACRE, HSE or other bodies; includes human health and environmental risks, containment measures etc.

Conducted by developers, member states and EFSA; includes human health and environmental risks, containment measures etc.

Conducted by developers, sometimes with assessment by USDA (e.g., APHIS), FDA, EPA; includes ecological and human health risks, containment measures etc.

R&D and/or trials

Research and development phase, including any necessary trials

Must comply with HSE regulations and legal conditions for trials

Must comply with local regulations and conditions, overseen by member states and EFSA

Must comply with federal regulations and may require Experimental Use Permits

Regulated product application

Application for product approval, assessing risks to human health and environment

Application includes detailed scientific data and risk assessments, reviewed by various committees depending on application

Application includes detailed scientific data and risk assessments, reviewed by member state competent authorities and EFSA

Application to USDA, FDA, or EPA, includes risk assessments and may involve GRAS determination

Scientific advisory committee review

Review by scientific advisory committees

May be reviewed by committees at DEFRA, FSA, HSE etc.; potentially assessed by reference laboratories; may request additional tests or information from developers

Reviewed by EFSA; potentially assessed by reference laboratories; may request additional tests or information from developers

Reviewed by relevant competent authority (USDA, FDA, EPA); may involve public consultation and scientific review

Public consultation and feedback

Period for public comments and feedback on the application

Consultation may take place during legislative process;

Public comments invited for 30–60 days; Member states develop emergency plans which can be consulted upon; compliance with transparency regulations

Public objections or complaints can be submitted within 30 days of an application’s publication

Decision to approve or request further info

Decision-making stage where approval is granted or further information requested

Decision to approve taken by ministers; may request further information before approval.

Vote by Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed (PAFF)

Decision by competent authority (USDA, FDA, EPA); may request further data or approve with conditions

Approval and conditions

Notification of approval and any associated legislative processes

Public notification of approval with or without conditions for distribution, sale, and use; compliance with inspections and other requirements

Public notification of approval with or without conditions for distribution, sale, and use; comply with inspections, reporting, and transparency requirements

Approval and registration with conditions for distribution, sale, and use; comply with inspections and reporting of adverse effects

Renewal of Authorisation

Process for renewing the authorisation after the initial approval period

Renew authorisation every 10 years

Renew GMO authorisation every 10 years

Renew permits and licences as required; comply with conditions and annual maintenance fees