Fig. 2: Assessment of allele-based clustering at all possible threshold levels for L. monocytogenes and comparison with traditional MLST. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Assessment of allele-based clustering at all possible threshold levels for L. monocytogenes and comparison with traditional MLST.

From: Multi-country and intersectoral assessment of cluster congruence between pipelines for genomics surveillance of foodborne pathogens

Fig. 2

a Composition of the L. monocytogenes dataset used in this study in terms of ST in comparison with datasets of previous studies (Maury et al. 2016139 and Moura et al. 201660), the LiSeq project140 and the BIGSdb database, as of November 202123. A GrapeTree59 visualization of the MST obtained with the INNUENDO-like pipeline is shown. Nodes (i.e., samples) are collapsed at the threshold with the highest congruence with CC (508 ADs for this pipeline) and colored according to the ST classification. b Number of partitions obtained by each pipeline at each possible distance threshold. c Clustering stability regions determined for each pipeline. To better distinguish each region (represented by separated rectangle blocks), the different blocks are vertically phased, starting in a different line. Distance thresholds (x axis) are presented in log2 scale. d Barplot (top) with the number of samples of the top represented STs (≥50 samples) in L. monocytogenes dataset, with a swarmplot (bottom) indicating the AD threshold at which each pipeline clusters together all samples of each ST. e Distribution of the AD thresholds at which each pipeline clusters together all samples of a given ST (n = 219). Boxplots show the interquartile range (25% to 75%) and median, and whiskers extend 1.5 times the range, with outliers (diamond symbol) plotted separately. The outlier STs are indicated above the respective symbol. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page