Fig. 6: Carbon management by method.
From: State-led climate action can cut emissions at near-federal costs but favors different technologies
Positive values indicate increased carbon management in the National Action scenario, while negative values indicate increased carbon management in the State Action scenario. Regions: (a) Northwest, (b) North Central, (c) Northeast, (d) California, (e) Central, (f) Mid-Atlantic, (g) Southwest, (h) Texas, (i) Southeast, and (j) Nationwide results. CCS = Carbon capture & storage, SMR = Steam methane reformation. The National Action scenario results in bioenergy with CCS, predominately in the Southeast, while the State Action scenario results in direct air capture in California and the Northeast.
