Table 2 Summary of the software comparison between varVAMP, Olivar and PrimalScheme

From: varVAMP: degenerate primer design for tiled full genome sequencing and qPCR

  

SARS-CoV-2

BoDV-1

HAV

HEV cluster 2

HEV cluster 4

PV

ratHEV

varVAMP

Running time

1 min 9 s

16 s

12 s

22 s

10 s

11 s

9 s

Number of amplicons

55

27

7

7

6

7

6

% alignment coverage

100

99

96

99

99

100

97

Mean mismatches per primer

0.002

0.17

0.15

0.21

0.20

0.13

0.43

Olivar

Running time

14 min 54 s

2 min 55 s

38 s

37 s

39 s

52 s

28 s

Number of amplicons

61

28

5

7

8

10

5

% alignment coverage

99

95

79

94

92

99

81

Mean mismatches per primer

0.001

0.44

0.88

1.03

1.09

1.63

2.11

Primalscheme (alignment)

Running time

7 min 32 s

23 min 52 s

17 h 11 min 33 s

8 h 8 min 4 s

50 h 25 min 56 s

5 h 37 min 56 s

48 s

Number of amplicons

49

25

6

8

8

8

6

% alignment coverage

100

88

79

99

97

95

91

Mean mismatches per primer

0.027

0.29

0.78

1.04

1.19

1.65

4.17

Primalscheme (consensus)

Running time

8 s

5 s

6 s

4 s

4 s

4 s

4 s

Number of amplicons

49

28

8

8

8

8

6

% alignment coverage

100

99

93

96

97

96

92

Mean mismatches per primer

0.027

0.73

1.63

1.48

1.63

2.60

3.04

  1. Running times were analyzed on the same hardware (i7 1185G7 4×3 GHz, 32 GB DDR4 RAM, Ubuntu 22.04.3). Moreover, the number of amplicons, alignment coverage and mean mismatches with alignment sequences are summarized.